What is Unarmed Robbery in Arizona A.R.S 13.1902
A person commits robbery if in the course of taking any property of another from his person or immediate presence and against his will, such person threatens or uses force against any person with intent either to coerce surrender of property or to prevent resistance to such person taking or retaining property.
Penalties for Someone Charged with the Crime of Unarmed Robbery in Arizona A.R.S. 13-1902.
The penalties for robbery in Arizona depend on various factors, including whether the robbery is committed with a deadly weapon, the presence of aggravating circumstances, and the specific details of the case. Robbery generally involves the use of force, threats, or intimidation to take someone else's property.
If the robbery is committed without the use of a deadly weapon, it is often classified as "unarmed" or "simple" robbery. Here are the general penalties for robbery in Arizona:
Robbery (Class 4 Felony):
- A Class 4 felony in Arizona is the classification for robbery without the use of a deadly weapon.
- Penalties may include imprisonment ranging from 1 year to 3.75 years, depending on various factors.
Defenses to the Crime of Unarmed Robbery in Arizona A.R.S. 13-1902.
Here are some potential defenses that might be applicable in cases of armed robbery:
Lack of Intent: If it can be demonstrated that the accused did not have the intent to commit robbery, it may be a defense. Intent is a crucial element in criminal cases, and the prosecution must prove that the defendant had the specific intent to commit the crime.
Mistaken Identity: If there is doubt about the identification of the perpetrator, it may be a defense. Eyewitness testimony can sometimes be unreliable, and factors such as poor lighting or stress during the incident could contribute to misidentifications.
False Accusation: If the accused can show evidence that they were falsely accused of armed robbery, it may serve as a defense. This might involve presenting an alibi, proving the accuser's motive to fabricate, or demonstrating inconsistencies in the accuser's statements.
Challenging the Evidence: This involves questioning the reliability of the evidence presented by the prosecution. For example, if the weapon allegedly used in the robbery was not properly handled or stored, the defense may challenge its admissibility in court.
Violation of Rights: If law enforcement officers violated the accused's constitutional rights during the arrest, questioning, or search, it could lead to the suppression of evidence or other legal consequences.
Coercion or Duress: If the accused can show that they committed the robbery under duress or coercion, it may be considered a defense. This defense argues that the accused acted against their will due to a credible threat of harm.
It's important to note that the effectiveness of these defenses depends on the specific facts of the case. Legal strategies should be developed in consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney who can provide guidance based on the individual circumstances.
Contact an Unarmed Robbery Crimes Defense Lawyer in Maricopa County
Immediately contact a criminal defense attorney to protect the rights of the accused. Call Brian Di Pietro Law, PLLC today for a free case evaluation about your pending unarmed robbery case in Arizona. Brian Di Pietro is an experienced, tough, aggressive Phoenix criminal defense attorney who will work hard to fight the charges against you to achieve the most favorable outcome for your particular robbery case. Contact now Brian Di Pietro Law, PLLC at 623-242-2655 for a free confidential case evaluation about your robbery charge in Arizona.