Close X

Criminal Simulation

What is Criminal Simulation A.R.S. 13-2004?

Criminal simulation typically refers to the act of imitating or reproducing something with the intent to deceive or defraud others. It often involves creating a false representation of an object, document, or currency. 

A person commits criminal simulation if, with intent to defraud, they:

  1. Make or alter an object so that it appears to have value because of age, antiquity, rarity, source, or authorship, when it does not.

  2. Possess an object so simulated, with intent to sell, pass, or otherwise utter it.

  3. Utter or pass an object so simulated.

A criminal defense attorney challenges the prosecutor to prove the specific intent necessary with this offense.

What Can Be Considered Criminal Simulation 

1.      Counterfeiting Currency: Creating fake money with the intent to use it as genuine currency.

2.      Forgery: Falsifying documents, signatures, or other items with the intent to deceive.

3.      Fraudulent Reproduction: Making fake goods or products with the intent to sell them as genuine.

4.      False Identification: Creating or using false identification documents, such as fake driver's licenses or passports.

5.      Embezzlement: Creating false records or transactions to misappropriate funds.

What are the Penalties for Criminal Simulation A.R.S. 13-2004

  • Criminal simulation is typically classified as a Class 6 felony in Arizona.

    • Class 6 felony penalties may include:

      • Up to 2 years of prison (presumptive), or more with prior felony convictions.

      • Fines, restitution, and probation possible.

    • In some cases, it may be reduced to a misdemeanor under certain plea agreements or sentencing alternatives.

                     A person may be probation eligible for this offense.

What are the Defenses to Criminal Simulation

Defending against a criminal simulation charge (ARS § 13-2004) in Arizona typically involves challenging key elements of the offense — especially the intent to defraud. Here are some common legal defenses:


1. Lack of Intent to Defraud

  • Key defense: The statute requires that the person acted “with intent to defraud.”

  • If the object was made, altered, or possessed without an intent to deceive or gain an unlawful benefit, then it may not meet the legal threshold.

  • Example: A person unknowingly bought or sold a fake antique without realizing it was inauthentic.


2. Lack of Knowledge

  • If the defendant did not know the object was simulated, forged, or fake, they might not be criminally liable.

  • Example: Selling a painting you believed to be original, but which turns out to be a counterfeit.


3. No Actual Simulation or Forgery

  • The object in question might not legally qualify as a “simulated” item under the law.

  • Example: Reproductions or replicas that are clearly labeled as such may not be criminal simulation.


4. Consent or Authorization

  • If the creation or alteration was done with the consent of the original artist, author, or source, it may not be fraudulent.

  • Example: A signed print authorized by the artist, even if mass-produced.


5. Entrapment

  • If law enforcement induced someone to commit the offense when they otherwise would not have, an entrapment defense may apply.

  • This is a more technical defense and depends on the specifics of how the arrest or sting operation happened.


6. Mistake of Fact

  • If the defendant made a reasonable and honest mistake about the nature or authenticity of the object, it can challenge the required intent.


7. Constitutional Violations

  • Evidence obtained in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights (e.g., illegal search or seizure, lack of Miranda warning) can be suppressed, possibly weakening the prosecution's case.


A qualified criminal defense attorney will typically review:
  • The evidence of intent to defraud

  • How the object was presented or marketed

  • Any expert analysis on whether the item is genuinely simulated

  • The circumstances of the arrest or investigation

Contact Brian Di Pietro Law, PLLC, Arizona's Tough Experienced Aggressive Fraud Offense Lawyer

Contact Brian Di Pietro Law, PLLC today for a free case evaluation about your pending criminal simulation crime case in Arizona. Brian Di Pietro is an experienced, tough, aggressive Phoenix criminal defense attorney who will work hard to fight the charges against you to achieve the most favorable outcome for your particular criminal simulation allegations. Contact now Brian Di Pietro Law PLLC at 623-242-2655 for a free confidential case evaluation about your criminal simulation allegations in Arizona.

Brian DiPietro Law, PLLC
Brian DiPietro Law, PLLC
Mon: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Tue: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Wed: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Thu: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Fri: 09:00am - 05:00pm

AWARDS AND ACCOLADES

"With 42 years of elite trial experience, Brian DiPietro provides sophisticated criminal defense to the Phoenix community. Since founding Brian DiPietro Law, PLLC, Brian has focused on protecting the liberty of those facing complex felony charges and high-stakes white-collar investigations. His four-decade legacy in Arizona's courts is built on rigorous preparation, technical statutory depth, and a commitment to securing just outcomes for every client."

Brian DiPietro Law, PLLC
Brian DiPietro Law, PLLC
Mon: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Tue: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Wed: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Thu: 09:00am - 05:00pm
Fri: 09:00am - 05:00pm